-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 601
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ci: Display performance measurement results as custom metrics #3491
Conversation
Display performance measurement results as custom metrics
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3491 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 91.70% 91.70%
=======================================
Files 159 159
Lines 10145 10145
Branches 2863 2896 +33
=======================================
Hits 9303 9303
Misses 840 840
Partials 2 2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚨 Try these New Features:
|
6b36a6c
to
9d9c15a
Compare
If this PR is taken in, additional action may be needed. |
@EdamAme-x |
Thank you all, these are nice improvements! Type performance is the only thing I mildly warn about when recommending hono to everyone! I love seeing how hono and its ecosystem is improving every week and hoping to contribute back with our own OS projects. Keep up the great work. |
9d9c15a
to
53bd319
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@yusukebe @EdamAme-x
Hi, I added the bundle size support. Can you take a look?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Octocov custom metrix
…69186026#step:7:96, Fix `no such file or directory`
Hi @EdamAme-x Also, can you review this? |
I was not able to verify the execution of jobs in |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great work!
(I had a Ureteral stone that knocked me down, so my review was late confirming it. My apologies lol.)
It would be a good idea to show both B and KB on custom metrics (but I don't think there's any rush to implement it now).
At any rate, let's try it out and see if there is any inconvenience in actually using it.
Thank you! Let's land it! |
Wooow, super cool! |
The author should do the following, if applicable
bun run format:fix && bun run lint:fix
to format the codeWhat's this all about?
This will be an improvement in type checking performance monitoring added by the following Pull Request.
#3406
In conjunction with octocov, type checking performance will be displayed as Pull Request comments and CI summary as follows
Pull Request comments
note: The bundle size is not shown as a diff since it is the first time, but it will be shown after the main branch is updated.Looks like the diff showed up just fine!
CI summary